Technology & Telecommunications
-
Telstra’s Growth Conundrum
Tim Kelley
March 27, 2013
Today’s AFR reports on Telstra’s (TLS) capital investment plans, and states that the man in charge of those investment plans, Brendon Riley, believes that “the answer to the growth question is to keep investing.”
We don’t disagree with this in principal, but note that historically, TLS has not had much success in investing for growth. continue…
by Tim Kelley Posted in Insightful Insights, Technology & Telecommunications.
-
MEDIA
Mining Services – a looming train wreck…
Roger Montgomery
March 27, 2013
In this interview on ABC1’s ‘The Business’, Roger discusses with Ticky Fullerton why he is virtually certain that the Mining Services industry is facing disaster, and he also is highly sceptical about Telstra’s (TLS) prospects. Watch here.
This program was broadcast 27 March 2013.
by Roger Montgomery Posted in Energy / Resources, Technology & Telecommunications, TV Appearances.
-
Telstra (TLS) vs M2 Telecommunications (MTU)
David Buckland
March 27, 2013
Interviewed by Peter Switzer last Thursday, I was asked why Montgomery doesn’t own any Telstra (ASX: TLS) shares.
Montgomery is a value investor that uses a highly disciplined and fact-based investment process.
We focus on investing in “extraordinary businesses” trading at a discount to their estimated intrinsic value.
by David Buckland Posted in Insightful Insights, Intrinsic Value, Technology & Telecommunications.
-
What is a game changer?
Roger Montgomery
March 20, 2013
Last night I received an unsolicited text message from Vodafone informing that Samsung had just released their Galaxy 4S. Vodafone cooed “it looks like a game changer”. Last week it was Dominos Pizza who insisted that new toppings (toppings others already had) and a square base (competitors already have those too) were ‘game changers’.
The noun Game Changer is being used a little too liberally at the moment, and lest it creep into our vernacular to such a degree that university students use it to describe skipping the train and catching the bus instead, I thought I’d attempt to use photographs to illustrate my understanding of game changers:-
continue…by Roger Montgomery Posted in Consumer discretionary, Insightful Insights, Technology & Telecommunications.
-
MEDIA
The numbers game
Roger Montgomery
March 1, 2013
In his March 2013 Money magazine column, Roger provides his insights into how to determine the true value of a business. Read here.
by Roger Montgomery Posted in In the Press, Insightful Insights, Investing Education, Technology & Telecommunications.
-
Cisco: Mobile data traffic to grow at 66% p.a. over the next five years
David Buckland
February 18, 2013
The Cisco White Paper, released recently, makes some extraordinary predictions over the next five years and and is well worth reading.
To summarise:
1. In 2012, global mobile traffic grew 70 per cent to 885 petabytes per month. By 2017, this will grow 13 times and surpass 11 exabytes per month, a compound annual growth rate of 66%;
by David Buckland Posted in Insightful Insights, Technology & Telecommunications, Value.able.
-
Cochlear? A second bite of the cherry for investors?
Roger Montgomery
February 11, 2013
Cochlear will be familiar to all of you. The company manufactures an implant that provides the gift of hearing to many thousands of hearing impaired people around the world. As you are also now aware Cochlear voluntarily recalled its Nuclear CI500 series in September 2011. Cochlear immediately switched to distributing its previous Nucleus CI24RE model with the new processors. And finally, you would be aware that Montgomery believed the recall was a rare buying opportunity buying as many shares as our portfolio construction process would allow at $50.
continue…by Roger Montgomery Posted in Insightful Insights, Technology & Telecommunications.
-
MEDIA
Telstra: Price Up, Value Way Down
Roger Montgomery
February 7, 2013
In these highlights from The 7 February edition of the Switzer Report, Roger addresses in detail the causes for the rising Telstra share price, and how the underlying position of the company is being impacted.
Roger also discusses The Reject Shop (TRS), Kathmandu (KMD), CSL (CSL), Seek (SEK), REA Group (REA), Resmed (RMD), and Leightons (LEI) – do they achieve the coveted A1 grade? Watch now to find out. Watch here.
by Roger Montgomery Posted in Technology & Telecommunications, TV Appearances.
-
Surprising on the Upside
Tim Kelley
November 27, 2012
We’re delighted to see CSL announce this morning that it expects NPAT in FY13 to be 20% higher (in constant currency terms) than in FY12. Previous guidance was for 12% growth.
CSL is exactly the sort of business we like at Montgomery. Its impressive balance sheet and financial performance have earned it a Montgomery quality rating of A1 or A2 for each of the last 6 years. In addition, the strong financial position of the business has allowed it to buy back shares. As a result, earnings per share will grow faster in FY13 than the estimated 20% rate of profit growth.
High quality businesses tend to be rewarding investments for long-term investors. While the broader market sits currently at about the same level it held in 2005, CSL shares are some 250% higher. The Montgomery [Private] Fund is happy to own shares in this excellent business.
by Tim Kelley Posted in Insightful Insights, Technology & Telecommunications.
-
Lamenting the Australian Index
Tim Kelley
November 24, 2012
One of the strategies available to people who lack the time or inclination for active portfolio management is to “buy the index”. This is normally done via an index fund, which invests in companies according to their index weights. These funds have a certain intuitive appeal, as they typically charge low fees and are easy to understand.
However, if you step back and think about it, we think some serious issues arise. In essence, an index fund invests in a company, simply because it is there. This may be a satisfactory rationale for climbing a mountain, but we think it falls short as an investment strategy, particularly in the Australian context.
The chart below shows the industry composition of the ASX200 index. Ignore the % numbers – they are the daily price changes from yesterday – and look at the size of the slices. What stands out is that financials and basic resources together account for more than 60% of the total. If you buy the Australian index, your returns will be dominated by the big 4 banks and a handful of large resources companies. This doesn’t look like a sensible portfolio construction to us, and the rationale “because they’re there” doesn’t provide much comfort.
ASX200 Index Composition
For comparison, the second chart, below, shows the composition of the US S&P500 index. A few things to note:
– Firstly, the US index has a much more even distribution, with 7 different industry groups representing a material part of the whole.
– Secondly, it’s interesting to note that technology is the largest single component of the US index, but is nothing more than a rounding error in the Australian index. In an age where commerce is being transformed by technology, is it good enough for Australian investors to have a <1% allocation to this sector ?
S&P500 Index Composition
by Tim Kelley Posted in Insightful Insights, Technology & Telecommunications.