Say farewell to the infrastructure boom

Say farewell to the infrastructure boom

In recent years, state budgets have benefited from rising revenues, particularly from stamp duty. But now that revenue stream is being squeezed, particularly in New South Wales and Victoria. This decline in revenue could be a real issue for businesses that rely on state infrastructure spending.

A couple of months ago, I wrote a blog post about the unrealistic assumptions about property prices and volumes that are underlying the state budgets, in particular New South Wales and Victoria.

It is therefore with interest that I note two news items released yesterday.

First, we have the non-partisan pre-election budget update from the secretary of the NSW Treasury department which was released on 5 May. New South Wales will have a state election on 23 March and the Treasury secretary has by law to provide an as unbiased as possible update on the state finances free from any political influence. The full report can be found here but I would like to highlight a couple of things.

  • The main highlight is that since the Half-Year Budget Review in December, the tax revenues have significantly underperformed primarily on the back of increasing price falls and very low transaction volumes in the property market. This has resulted in the forecasted state revenues to be $477 million lower than what was forecasted in December (only a 2 month period). Due to the delays in some infrastructure projects, expenses will also be lower than expected but not enough to offset the lower revenues so the projected budget surplus falls by $273 million or about 24 per cent to $846 million.
  • Even though the forecasts for property stamp duty revenues have been revised down for the coming years as well, they do still look quite aggressive to me with a rather steep bounce in 2020-21 and 2021-22 meaning that we either need to see transaction volumes pick up significantly and/or prices increase significantly again.
  • Screen Shot 2019-03-06 at 12.02.29 pm As a result, the forecasted budget surpluses in future years have actually overall been increased despite an economy that is showing clear signs of slowing down, which seems very optimistic to me.

Screen Shot 2019-03-06 at 12.04.24 pm

The second interesting news item is an ABC article indicating that the Victorian Treasurer is offering public sector unions wage increases of 2 per cent or well below the current cost of living increases and is citing falling revenues on the back of lower property transaction taxes collected (at least it is good to see that Victorian parliamentarians received a pay increase of 5.3 per cent in 2018).

Both of these news items reinforce our view that state budgets will come under pressure over the coming years and that planned infrastructure spend might be less than forecasted.

The Montgomery Fund is positioned accordingly with no exposure to companies depending on domestic construction activity.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


3 Comments

  1. Hard not to laugh at Philip Lowe when he claims that 1) housing price falls are not the main problem – low wages growth is. I.e. “Quick! Look over there!” and 2) it wasn’t the RBA that made all the money flow into higher house prices – it was the developers that did it.

  2. andrew ronan
    :

    All very logical Andreas, but after hearing the RBA almost beg the government to start a massive infrastructure programme as well as dissing boss for being tight fisted for not giving large pay rises etc, I smell panic in the air, the RBA is blaming everyone else and diverting attention away to avoid the blame for what’s coming and what they caused, with tax takes down and welfare costs rising because of the bursting bubble, my bet is zero interest rates, infrastructure boom, QE all coming our way.

    • Andreas Lundberg
      :

      Hi Andrew,

      The RBA is clearly worried but is trying to keep up a straight face. I have been arguing for well over a year that the next interest move would be down and not up and it is now looking even more likely. Deflating a debt bubble is always painful but the longer you try to keep it flying the more painful it becomes. Lets hope that they do not try to go all in. As Andrew argued in a post a little while ago, Australian public debt to GDP is quite low so some stimulus can definitely be done but hopefully it will be done in a way that does not further inflate the private debt bubble.

Post your comments