• Check out my latest feature on Ausbiz discussing AI's current winners and losers WATCH HERE

Does the market offer value?

Does the market offer value?

Over the long haul, the equity market tends to offer a pretty good deal. Compared with holding cash, investors assume a significant amount of risk, but that risk is generally well-rewarded with higher returns. If your timeframe is long enough, the risks tend to even out somewhat, and the returns compound meaningfully. Staying in cash for twenty or thirty years would normally be a dreadful investment strategy.

At the same time, it pays to be mindful of value. For example, investors who bought into the US NASDAQ Index at the height of the last tech boom faced a 15 year wait before the Index recovered the levels it reached in 2000. This is an extreme example, but it illustrates the point that paying too much for equities can set you up for a long stretch of disappointment.

With that as context, where does the Australian equity market sit at the moment, relative to “fair value”?

At Montgomery, we take pride in being able to gauge value, and we aim to preserve flexibility by holding higher levels of cash when valuations start to become expensive. Trying to understand where we should sit is something that takes up quite a bit of our time.

One good way of addressing the value question is to use automated valuation tools to map out the path followed by the market as it meanders between cheap and expensive. We frequently run this type of analysis by feeding a set of companies into our valuation systems, and working out the ratio of value to price over time. We tend to focus on companies that are reliable earners, and therefore “easy” to value. By estimating the value of our sample companies in a consistent (ie. automated) way, we end up with a measure that is free from the biases and mood swings that creep into human judgements.

The chart below shows the result of such an analysis over the last ten years. Where the ratio is high, the sample companies are trading at relatively attractive prices, and where it is low, value is becoming scarce.

Tim

 

What the chart seems to be telling us is:

  • For a period following the GFC, valuations generally were attractive. This should come as no surprise, as a great many investors became disillusioned with equities during the GFC, and were subsequently reluctant to pay much for them; and
  • More recently, valuations have more or less fallen into line with pre-GFC levels. In this context, they do not appear outrageously expensive, but they certainly offer less compelling value than they did a few years ago.

This leaves us in a slightly uncomfortable middle ground. From here there is the potential for equities to deliver quite reasonable long-run returns, so it doesn’t make sense to be all in cash, but there is also the real possibility of a swing back towards better value, so it makes sense to hold some cash, and have the option value that comes with it.

So that is what we’ll do.

Tim Kelley is Montgomery’s Head of Research and the Portfolio Manager of The Montgomery Fund. To learn more about our funds please click here.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Tim joined Montgomery in July 2012 and is a senior member of the investment team. Prior to this, Tim was an Executive Director in the corporate advisory division of Gresham Partners, where he worked for 17 years. Tim focuses on quant investing and market-neutral strategies.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


Post your comments