Five Forces
The importance of ROE (return on equity) and buying companies with bright prospects is sacrosanct here at the Insights Blog but why? ROE is an important explanatory variable for superior share price performance and so we want businesses that can sustain high rates of return. When I talk about bright prospects it is the sustainability of these high rates of return that I am referring to. Whether the bright prospects relate to a rising tide of customers, the ability to pass on rising costs, the ability to be the low cost provider or the changing competitive landscape, how these factors serve to produce a high rate of return on equity is what we care about.
More specifically, it’s the marginal return on equity that drives the value, or the return generated on the incremental capital invested in the business to deliver earnings growth.
Created by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter to analyse the attractiveness and likelihood of profitability of an industry, Porter’s Five Forces are a simple but powerful tool for understanding where power lies in any business situation. Using this tool, you can gain insight into the competitive strength of an investee candidate.
While these Five Forces are typically used by companies to determine whether new products, services or businesses may be profitable, investors can use them to analyse the competitive position of any industry member.
Numerous economic studies have shown that different industries can sustain different levels of profitability. This can be attributed to differences in industry structures. Within those industries however there is a pecking order of companies and Porter’s five forces reinforces the need to understand where your investee candidate sits and whether that high ROE being produced today can be sustained.
The Porter’s Five Forces model is a tool that we have found to be helpful when picking companies in which to invest. I came across this model while I was studying an Information Systems subject at University.
The Porter’s Five Forces model was developed by Michael Porter to help understand a company’s competitive advantage. The five “forces” that are identified by Porter are:
1) Threat of new entrants
New entrants can increase market competition between companies. In the absence of a dominant player, this can lead to erosion of profit margins.
The threat of new entrants is highly dependent on the barriers to entry. For example, it is relatively easy to start a small pizza business, but it would be difficult to compete with or replicate Cochlear’s business due to the massive R&D costs and intellectual property that is hard to obtain.
2) Power of suppliers
Suppliers can place pressure on margins if they are dominant players in the market. This can be observed in the technology retailing market. The market power of Apple products and their ability to drive store traffic means it can dictate pricing, tactical promotional activity levels and margins to the retailers.
3) Power of customers
A profitable company depends on attracting and retaining customers. However, customers hold the power when they can easily switch to a competitor’s product or service.
In a competitive market where there is little product differentiation, particularly in industries where products have become commoditised, customers have the power to force businesses to compete on price. This is evident with online book stores, where consumers have the ability to search for and compare the cheapest prices across online retailers such as Amazon, eBay, Book Depository and Booktopia, forcing traditional bricks and mortar book stores to compete.
4) Availability of substitutes
In the majority of industries there are substitutes that a customer might use if prices become prohibitively high. Substitutes can be seen in the energy sectors, for example, petrol is increasingly being substituted with ethanol in cars.
New technologies also create substitutes. The introduction of electronic downloadable music has been very popular with consumers who wish to purchase and download music at their convenience. CD sales have dwindled much to the dismay of record labels. Companies need to be agile and adapt to new trends. Kodak is a classic example of a company that did not move with the times.
5) Existing competitors
Competitors all fight for market share by developing their brands and by attempting to attract customers. Increased competition can lead to the erosion of profit margins. Innovation can help, however this is difficult for businesses that operate in a commodity-type business. Explosives manufacturers (e.g. Orica and IPL) typically sell the same products as their competitors, and perhaps their investment in R&D for specific applications is a means for them to differentiate themselves from their competitors.
The video below explains Porter’s Five Forces:
Stuart Jackson is a Senior Analyst with Montgomery Investment Management. To invest with Montgomery domestically and globally, find out more.
This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.
INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY
john phillips
:
Thanks Roger. Also perhaps for Stuart
So I assume then the effectiveness of this style of investing such as the calculating the intrinsic value of a share etc. has not been lessened by digital disruption technologists ??
That is the technologies like: HFT trading combined with technical trading etc
John
Stuart Jackson
:
Hi John,
Continued advancements in artificial intelligence is the ultimate long term competitive threat to all forms of labour. Thankfully, technology that replaces fundamental analysis appears to be some way off at this point. There are many strategies employed in investing. HFT is something that has developed over a number of years. It takes advantage of information from transaction activity, and through the use of predictive algorithms and enhanced execution speed, attempts to effectively front-run natural flow. While there has been a lot of discussion about where the profits generated by high frequency traders come from, because its competitive advantage is derived from trading flow, it can be argued that it has more impact of the sustainable investment returns of more active short term trading based investment strategies relative to lower turnover long term value investment strategies.
When it comes to more quantitative based models, these strategies are more effective in trending markets. As was demonstrated in 2008 and 2009, when there is a significant change in market trends, quant models become more problematic. This is when disciplined value-based investing becomes even more successful.
john phillips
:
Hi Stuart
thanks for the response, it was informative and analytical
I notice on the ASIC site which you have probably seen anyway
“While predatory trading does not appear to be excessive in our markets, it can adversely affect trading outcomes for investors.”
http://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/markets/market-structure/dark-liquidity-and-high-frequency-trading/review-of-high-frequency-trading-and-dark-liquidity-2015/
John
Stuart Jackson
:
The profits HFT could come from a number of areas. They will generally argue that they are providing liquidity in the market, so their profits come from a reduction in the liquidity premium paid by investors. Given the standard HFT strategy, It is easy to argue the opposite as well, that by trading faster and in anticipation of the natural flow, HFT increases the liquidity cost for real investors. As I suggested earlier, this argues in favour of a lower turnover, higher conviction investment strategy for investors.
tony wray
:
The five forces are some of the points management should look at in corporate planning strategy but something investors particularly the ordinary investor should be aware of when searching out a company to invest in, right now I am thinking about applying it to Coca Cola.
I found the article useful and I think Skaffold is great.
Stuart Jackson
:
Hi Tony,
Coca Cola is a company that has historically had a very positive ‘5 forces’ type structure and has been a core holding of Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway for a number of decades. The one change in more recent years has been the threat of competitive substitutes, with consumers looking for a broader range of beverages. While Coca Cola has invested in broadening its product offering into so called non carbonated soft drinks (non-CSDs), the question is whether it is sufficiently focused on these categories in the market. The big positive for the company is the depth and breadth of its distribution capability. This gives it significant advantages in being able to get new products in front of consumers.
john phillips
:
Hi Stuart
Great info
I have a question for you
I have this suspicion in the back of my mind and wanted to see what your thoughts are.
Do you think the value investing methodology etc used traditionally by “Buffet” style investors has now sort of been lessened in its effectiveness by digital disruption technologists ?
sort of like beiing “Ubered”
John
Roger Montgomery
:
Hi John, Expect to Stuart to chime in here too. For mine, you cannot disrupt common sense. It always finds a way to reset everyone’s compass.
Joe
:
Great post Stuart – thanks!
Stuart Jackson
:
You’re welcome Joe