• In this whitepaper Montaka identifies key features of enterprise technology businesses that make them highly resilient and durable investments in most economic conditions. Download here.

A recap of the bids made for Infigen Energy


A recap of the bids made for Infigen Energy

Our readers know we like the Infigen Energy (ASX:IFN) equity story; IFN is a renewable electricity generator and it offers a way to play the green theme here in Australia. We shared our investment thesis in an article posted in early February, a lot has happened since then. Here’s why we have sold and moved on.

IFN and COVID-19

IFN provided its COVID impact update to the market on 1 May, the Government mandated economic lockdown had the effect of lowering demand on the National Electricity Market (NEM) and with it the wholesale price of Electricity. IFN is exposed to this weaker short-term price environment for the uncontracted portion of it’s electricity generation that it sells into the market on a daily basis, which is roughly 30 per cent of its generation. IFN’s tactical response is to push back its growth plans, deferring the development and contracting of more generation capacity until economic conditions became clearer. In our view this response makes sense as it preserves IFN’s ability to grow when the conditions are better suited to support that and avoids IFN locking in the current weak pricing environment for longer than necessary.

3/6/20 Take-over offer 1 – UAC 80c cash

On 3 June UAC announced that it had accumulated a 12.8 per cent stake in IFN and that it would make a take-over offer at 80c, a 33 per cent premium to the undisturbed price. The offer includes FIRB (Foreign Investment Review Board) approval condition and is not subject to a minimum acceptance level.

UAC describes itself as a power generation developer, it has a small number of projects here in Australia that are in the development phase, none appear to be operational. It’s not clear from the company website if these projects have attained funding or have attracted counter-parties willing to contract for supply, offering some questions on the credibility of the UAC take-over scenario. UAC’s takeover announcement states that UAC is 75 per cent owned by Ayala Corporation, a Philippines listed company with a market cap of approximately A$14 billion.

17/6/20 Take-over offer 2 – Iberdrola 86c

On 17 June Iberdrola announced it had launched a bid for IFN offering 86c a share, this time with IFN’s board approval and a deal with IFN’s largest shareholder, TCI (33 per cent ownership) to sell a 20 per cent shareholding to Iberdrola. The board support, and the 20 per cent share sale by TCI are subject to a no superior offer condition, Iberdrola’s bid is subject to some conditions including FIRB, which we think are likely to be met.

Iberdrola is huge, it is one of the largest listed electricity utilities globally, it’s the world’s largest generator of wind power, it holds over Euro 120 billion of assets and made over Euro 10 billion in EBITDA last year and is an existing operator here in Australia. Iberdrola ticks the credibility box and then some.

Time to move on and find the next one

We don’t think UAC is going to be able to compete with Iberdrola, it doesn’t appear to have the same financial firepower, industry capability and portfolio exposure here in Australia with which to extract maximum value from IFN’s asset base. There could be other bidders emerge, but it’s a tough ask to take on one of the world’s largest utilities, well funded, with domain expertise and renewable generation specialists. Iberdrola have done a deal with a very long term 33 per cent shareholder and the board whom presumably have a very strong idea as to value attainable, implying that an appropriate and likely value threshold has been approached if perhaps not reached.

We’ve got what we came for, IFN’s under-valuation has been discovered. We’d have preferred to see the fruits of IFN’s growth strategy get delivered as it likely creates greater value over time, but sometimes it doesn’t play out that way. Rather than wait to discover if there is an incremental price bump in a bidding scenario and run the risk of the share price falling back to bid level or lower, we have sold and move on to find the next one.

Please click here to read the blog from early February


Gary is the Portfolio Manager of the Montgomery Small Companies Fund. Gary joined Montgomery in August 2019 after spending three years at MHOR Asset Management in Sydney as a Founder and Portfolio Manager. Prior to this, Gary was a Portfolio Manager at Renaissance Asset Manager in Sydney for six years. Before moving to Australia, Gary spent five years in London running Morgan Stanley’s Technology Sector Equity Research Team, as well as two years covering technology companies for JP Morgan.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE


find out more



  1. Kimber_Rothwell_Oliveira

    I came to the same conclusion and took a 65% pre tax gain off the table. While this sounds impressive there were more impressive returns for a longer hold. I was disappointed to sell.

Post your comments