Is it time to sell?
If you take your cues from price rather than values, fear may have recently set in. For Value.able investors, a market correction is a reason for celebration rather than consternation. Roger Montgomery explains why holding on may be the wiser decision. Read Roger’s article
MORE BY RogerINVEST WITH MONTGOMERY
Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chairman of Montgomery Investment Management. Roger has over three decades of experience in funds management and related activities, including equities analysis, equity and derivatives strategy, trading and stockbroking.
Prior to establishing Montgomery, Roger held positions at Ord Minnett Jardine Fleming, BT (Australia) Limited and Merrill Lynch.
This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.
Brad
:
My iv for voc is > $3 for 2012
Lots of growth ahead for this well run IT / Comms company
Great article in Tuesday’s afr on growth in data traffic driven by smart phones and tablets
2 months ago I had home delivered, AFR, Age, Australian newspapers. I now get the oz and as of this week age and SMH on iPad.
I’m sure AFR iPad app not far off and no more trudging out to the front yard at 630am in my pj’s
Denise
:
Hi Roger
The table in the article lists Worley Parsons code as WPL and the corresponding price at $45.07. WPL is Woodside Petroleum Ltd
Worley Parsons code is WOR and price in May would have been somewhere between $28 and $31
Did I missed a great sell opportunity!! Unfortunately not!
Denise
Roger Montgomery
:
Thanks Denise, You are editor #3 thank you for helping to correct.
Michael H
:
the article also has a typo which is rather misleading, the code for Worley is WOR not WPL and thus the “price now” is around $30 not $45, the price of Woodside as stated in the table
Roger Montgomery
:
Thanks Michael, You are sub editor #4
Lloyd
:
Q: Is it time to sell?
A: No that time has past.
Lloyd
:
And the more relevant question: Is it too early to buy?
Those margins of safety still look pretty skinny given the 2012 IV’s are based on some pretty inflated analyst expectations!
So what do you think?
Greg Mc
:
G’day Lloyd,
With the market down a whole whopping 6% from the 12 month high set in April, if it wasn’t outrageously cheap then, it still isn’t now. Selected things might be on the cheap side, but those margins could easily expand further.
Ann-marie
:
P-A-SS-E-D. Any way who cares if we cannot spell as long as we can C-O-U-N-T.
Lloyd
:
No – to correct your misunderstanding, like Shelley I used it:
Time Long Past
by Percy Bysshe Shelley
(1803-1822)
Like the ghost of a dear friend dead
Is Time long past.
A tone which is now forever fled,
A hope which is now forever past,
A love so sweet it could not last,
Was Time long past.
There were sweet dreams in the night
Of Time long past:
And, was it sadness or delight,
Each day a shadow onward cast
Which made us wish it yet might last-
That Time long past.
There is regret, almost remorse,
For Time long past.
‘Tis like a child’s belovèd corse
A father watches, till at last
Beauty is like remembrance, cast
From Time long past.
Lloyd
:
Shelley’s “Time Long Past” provides a beautiful metaphor for the prism through which many view past share/market price action as being relevant to current share/market valuations forgetting that the period 2003-2007 …”is Time long past. A tone which is now forever fled, A hope which is now forever past, A love so sweet it could not last, Was Time long past.”
Yet the longing for a return to the Past persists, to the point that it overrides most investors understanding of the current reality, indeed the irony, of a deleveraging consumer based global GDP, which is being sustained momentarily by burgeoning, but unsustainable growth in Government debt.
Roger Montgomery
:
Thanks Lloyd,
Geoff B
:
Roger,
I am a little confused. In this article you have the IV of ORL as $8.96, however, under your blog ‘Is it time to clean up your portfolio’ , dated 11/5/11, you have the IV for ORL as $6.99. I tend to suspect the IV of $8.96 was beofre the release of their last figures and that the $6.99 is what it should be today.
Geoff
Roger Montgomery
:
Yes Geoff,
Very long lead time in magazine publishing but those valuations are from the date those stocks were first talked about (over the course of the last year).
Brad J
:
Hi Roger,
Nice article but is your IV for Vocus meant to have a 2 in front of it or am I missing something? In your article in the Eureka report dated the 18th May you have the IV at $2.45.
Roger Montgomery
:
WIll have a look and hope you are wrong!
Dave T
:
Hi Roger,
Hate to be fastidious; but, I think under the company name, you’ve used WorleyParsons instead of Woodside. You had me anxiously double-checking my IVs there for a few minutes!
Roger Montgomery
:
Thanks for pointing it out Dave. I think you are on the money.
Michael
:
Hi Brad,
I agree with Rogers updated IV, and posted mine at $1.75 on April 10:
http://rogermontgomery.com/stars-of-the-data-world/#comment-11583
Way too much optimism was priced into the stock when it hit $3, but it still has some way to go before getting to its intrinsic value in my view. Return on equity is only inflated by debt at the moment and will fall over the coming years.
Brad J
:
Hi Michael,
Rogers valuation for it must have changed then since the 18th of May, which isn’t long ago. Seems a bit strange that he purchased it at $2 and if this value is right it is significantly more than his current IV assuming this article is correct. Would you please clarify this Roger rather than us all trying to second guess if a typo has been made or not?
Roger Montgomery
:
They’re the valuations at the time they were mentioned. They cover a year of columns for the magazine.
Ian
:
Hi Roger,
I am still a bit confused.
In the money magazine article it has the intrsic value of Vocus listed at $1.74 with a date of edition of APR’11.
The April 2011 edition says ” I estimate Vocus’s Value.Able intrinisc valuewill increase almost 20% over three years, rising from my current estimate of $2.45.”
Which I understand to mean that the intrinsic value for Vocus was $2.45 when you wrote the column for the April 2011 magazine.
Or is date APR’11 the wrong date in the current article?
Roger Montgomery
:
That is odd.
Rod h
:
It doesn’t state when the Intrisic Value is accurate to.
Is it at the edition date or is it as of 13- May ?
Roger Montgomery
:
13 May.
Johan van Wyk
:
Hi Roger,
Are the 13 May valuations based on FY10 financial numbers or FY11 estimates?
Thanks!
Roger Montgomery
:
It was written some time ago – long lead times in magazine publishing, so I will have to go back and have a look.
Michael H
:
the article also has a typo, the code for Worley is WOR, not WPL (Woodside) as stated which leads to an incorrect “price now” being $45 in the table when it should be closer to $30
Roger Montgomery
:
Thanks Michael, Yes it was picked up earlier. Good of you to help edit and keep correct.