• Check out my latest feature on Ausbiz discussing AI's current winners and losers WATCH HERE

Woolies is coming up empty…

Woolies is coming up empty…

Back in November last year, when the Woolworths share price was closer to $34 than the $28 it is near today, we warned that the company would be seriously challenged and profit-hobbled by the emergent giant Aldi.

In our blog post dated November 26, 2014, Russell Muldoon wrote of Aldi:

“They have succeeded in every market they have selected to operate in and the incumbents have had no response simply because Aldi is 60 per cent more efficient.  For example, rather than offering 32 different brands, sizes and types of tomato sauce as Coles and Woolies might, at Aldi you will find only one…

“Rather than spreading their buying power over 32 different sku’s, Aldi focus on the best quality product they can secure for the price they can achieve and push all of their buying power through that one product and the one supplier. The benefit of this is pretty clear – this enables the business at just 350 stores to already match or better the terms of the more established players and offer even lower prices…

“To gain some understanding of the impact a highly evolved discount grocer can have on a large incumbent take a look at Carrefour SA (PA:CARR), one of Europe’s largest food retailers [Carrefour was founded in 1959] in France and operates a network of >10,000 supermarkets [and stores and the] company employees 363,989 staff.”

“At its peak between 1998 and 2001, Carrefour generated average EBITDA margins of ~6.8 per cent and EBIT margins of ~3.8 per cent.”

“The impact of ‘hard discount retailers’ such as Aldi and Lidl has been profound on Carrefour. In 2013 margins have fallen to 4.9 per cent and 2.9 per cent respectively. The share price reaction to this falling profitability has been profound. At its peak, Carrefour SA shares traded for ~€70, today they trade at €25.”

With that background in mind, we read with interest Sue Mitchell’s piece about Woolies, citing recent broker research, in The Australian Financial Review yesterday.

Essentially Woolies is “investing” in lower prices. That means they will earn less on each item. Their response has already been tried elsewhere in the world and it has not worked.

The article also notes that they have sacked a number of marketing directors in as many years. Blaming marketing for an inferior competitive and inferior structural position is simply sad and indicates management at Woolies might be all thumbs on this one.

Here are a few worrying quotes from the ARF.

“Woolworths’ plan to cut the price of private label grocery brand to better compete with Aldi and Coles may cost the retailer as much as $1 billion, reducing earnings from food and liquor by almost a third, according to brokers.”

“Woolworths is reviewing its private label grocery strategy after admitting a week ago that consumers perceived the quality of Aldi’s private label brands to be on par or better than Woolworths’ Select brand and superior to its entry-level Homebrand range.”

Woolworths has flagged plans to add more entry-level products to its private label range and match prices on key private label items to “close the gap” with Aldi and Coles.

“We’re not going to be beaten on price relative to our major full line supermarket competitor,” Woolworths’ new Food Group managing director, Brad Banducci, told investors earlier this month. “The issue we’ve got with Aldi is providing the same value experience in our store as you would in an Aldi, which requires us to rethink and re-engineer some of our entry level products including some of our entry level own brands.”

“Mr Kierath said that if Woolworths cut the price of Select products by 10 per cent it would reduce food and liquor margins by 84 basis points to 6.57 per cent, cutting earnings before interest and tax by $388 million.”

“The retailer also needs to improve its marketing to convince consumers that its prices are competitive. Earlier this week, Woolworths confirmed it had parted ways with its fourth marketing director in as many years, with CMO Tony Phillips stepping down after a year in the role.”

“Without improved marketing, Woolworths will continue to struggle with its value perception,” said Deutsche Bank analyst Michael Simotas.

Coles is expected to outline its response to Woolworths’ plans at Wesfarmers’ annual strategy day in Sydney on Wednesday.

We wish Coles and Woolies every success. They’re going to need it.

Montgomery is no longer a shareholder in Woolworths and we argue that Woolies and Coles are no longer Blue Chips.

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer of Montgomery Investment Management. To invest with Montgomery, find out more.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chairman of Montgomery Investment Management. Roger has over three decades of experience in funds management and related activities, including equities analysis, equity and derivatives strategy, trading and stockbroking. Prior to establishing Montgomery, Roger held positions at Ord Minnett Jardine Fleming, BT (Australia) Limited and Merrill Lynch.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


11 Comments

  1. John Gillard
    :

    Hi Roger, I beat you out of WOW & have been looking for an oportunity to get into Westfarmers as I couldn’t see a way Aldi could help me more (There was a limit to the dosh I could save by eating & drinking more Aldi stuff). It occurs though that a thought may have occurred to you along the lines of who finds Aldi’s store sites or does their accounting etc.

  2. Paul Friedrich
    :

    Joel, which is exactly the reason why ALDI is actually dangerous to competition. ALDI is extracting profits from the Super Funds and investment portfolios of Australians and taking them back to a private company in Germany.

    • xiao fang xu
      :

      free market and competition is good.

      “the art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.” Coupled with Hazlitt’s suspicion of the “special pleading of selfish interests,” and his magnificent rendition of Bastiat’s “broken-window” example, the plan of Economics in One Lesson is clear: drill these insights into the reader in the first few chapters, and then apply them, relentlessly, without fear or favor, to a whole host of specific examples. Every widespread economic fallacy embraced by pundits, politicians, editorialists, clergy, academics is given the back of the hand they so richly deserve by this author: that public works pro- mote economic welfare, that unions and union-inspired minimum wage laws actually raise wages, that free trade creates unemployment, that rent control helps house the poor, that saving hurts the economy, that profits exploit the poverty stricken, the list goes on and on.

      https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Economics%20in%20One%20Lesson_2.pdf

      what is not seen :

more money for all of us to spend on something else ( more jobs for other people ).

waste — inefficient companies waste resources.

      eventually new small companies with better ideas will come and cycle restart.

    • Colin Petersen
      :

      We’ve had a long-term duopoly, both participants of which have recently been found to have engaged in unconscionable conduct. The idea that a market-share minnow (Aldi was ~10% last I read) is “dangerous to competition” in this setting is hilarious.

      • Just watch Colin. Turning points are the hardest thing for humans to discern. That market share minnow has stronger buying power in the products it stocks than the two majors combined.

  3. Interestingly, as both woolies and coles increase their selection of own-brand products (whilst reducing other lines) they become even more like aldi etc. They become closer to the competition who they are struggling to beat at their own game, further reducing their point of difference and margins at the same time.

    The question is what customers want, maybe we will end up with more companies offering less variety, less choice and less products. Making all the companies less profits.

Post your comments