• In this whitepaper Montaka identifies key features of enterprise technology businesses that make them highly resilient and durable investments in most economic conditions. Download here.

Why you need to price in market expectations

27112018_Why you need to price in market expectations

Why you need to price in market expectations

Have you ever wondered why it is that a company’s share price tanks after a positive earnings report?  It’s more common than you think, and it’s all about long-term market expectations that go well beyond the current quarter of earnings.

Successful investing is not only about having a disciplined, value investing framework for stock selection. It also involves thinking about what the market has priced into a security, and whether it represents good value at that price.  This twin approach is used by the team at Montgomery Global.

There is perhaps no better example of how long-term market expectations can affect share prices than the most recent U.S. earnings season, which has now largely concluded, with 483 of the 500 companies within the S&P 500 having reported. Of the companies that have reported earnings, about 60 per cent beat consensus revenue expectations and around 80 per cent beat earnings (EPS) expectations (according to Bloomberg). However, the S&P 500 is actually down ~9 per cent since earnings season commenced. Clearly, the market was expecting more.

Looking at some of the largest stock price declines for companies from this earnings season reveals the importance of having a firm understanding of exactly what is priced into the share price. For instance, despite microchip manufacturer Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) beating expectations by 4.6 per cent, its stock crashed by 29.6 per cent after it reported the result. There are several more examples of this in the chart below.

Companies that Beat Consensus Estimates However Experienced Significant Share Price Declines

Screen Shot 2018-11-27 at 9.22.51 am

In addition to whether or not a company has “beaten” estimates it is important to focus on the quality of earnings and whether the beat is likely to be sustainable. Clearly many of the companies above were unable to convince the market that, despite reporting healthy “beats”, they were likely driven by transient effects that will dissipate more quickly than the market had priced-in for the future.


Amit joined MGIM in April 2018 as a Senior Research Analyst after spending seven years as a credit analyst at Credit Agricole and Citigroup, based in New York. Prior to this, Amit was an investment banker with Citigroup for five years in New York and Sydney, focusing on Media and Telecoms; Metals and Mining; and Consumer Products.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE


find out more


Post your comments