Why our small companies fund is underweight the retail sector

Why our small companies fund is underweight the retail sector

It’s a tough time to be a retailer, what with increasing interest rates, fuel and energy costs putting a squeeze on consumer spending. And some retailers are particularly adversely affected. Which is why investors need to be highly selective – especially when it comes to buying shares in consumer discretionary businesses.

Gary Rollo and Dominic Rose manage the Montgomery Small Companies Fund with an approach to managing risk I’ve not seen elsewhere. Using a bottom-up research-driven process to determine preferred holdings, they keep a vigilant eye on the ‘shape’ of the portfolio, adjusting holdings based on the idea of known knowns, and known unknowns.

At the moment the portfolio is overweight beaten-up stocks that might be characterized as ‘growth’ stocks and GARP (Growth at a Reasonable Price) companies.  It is also overweight companies investors might classify as Energy Security and Digital Infrastructure companies.

While success in the selection of stocks to be overweight is an important source of alpha, so is the selection of stocks to be underweight. On that front, old-world fund managers, which are found in the Financial sector are being eschewed. With the performance of agriculture arguably as good as it gets, stocks in this space are commanding a major underweight position in the portfolio. Meanwhile, rising rates have rendered REITS an underweight, while rising rates is also a reason for an underweight position in consumer discretionary stocks.

Consumer Discretionary is, of course, a broad sector and there are many players with different risk, sales and customer profiles. Vendors promoting large discretionary purchases (think Nick Scali, ASX:NCK) for example, may experience the current conditions differently to Lovisa (ASX:LOV), whose performance may prove more resilient thanks to a target customer that is employed but probably too young to have a mortgage and therefore less exposed to rising interest rates.

Figure 1. Australian retail trade nominal – monthly series

Source: ABS, Macquarie Research

Nevertheless, there’s an irrefutable cloud over the entire sector and it’s illustrated in Figure 1.  According to Macquarie Research’s analysis of ABS data, COVID and the associated lockdowns raised consumption levels dramatically above trend and therefore pulled-forward consumption from future years. Australian shoppers are estimated to have been overconsuming (above trend) to the tune of approximately 15 per cent. And according to Macquarie, in the Household Goods subsector, excess spending is 22 per cent. Moreover, domestic retail profits are estimated to be 64 per cent higher in 2023 versus the pre-COVID levels of 2019.

Meanwhile, the commencement of Reserve Bank interest rate rises is important because they will impact consumption already at an unsustainable level. 

A retail spending vacuum

The implication is consumption must return to trend and for that to be achieved a steep drop in consecutive rates of growth must occur. In other words, negative rates of consumption growth – even sharply negative – must be generated for consumption to return to long-term trend rates of growth.

But of course, that is only the case if consumption were to return to trend quickly.

A different and perhaps gentler return-to-trend picture may be evolving if recent CBA real-time spending data is considered.

Instead of the ‘cliff drop’ scenario proposed by some commentators, credit and debit card data from the CBA at the end of September revealed spending had plateaued, since March, at 1.3 times 2019 (pre-pandemic) levels. Taking inflation into account, the data suggests volumes might in fact be declining.

More recently, a cursory glance at CBA real-time debit card data (Figure 2.) suggests spending remains buoyant.

Figure 2. CBA real-time debit and credit card spending 28 October 2022

While the CBA’s internal credit and debit card spending data between March and September revealed a plateauing of spending, the data since, and to October 28, reveals spending remains elevated; however, a deeper dive shows non-retail card spending growth has edged higher recently due to rising utility bills. Meanwhile, retail card spending growth appears to have indeed plateaued.

But a false sense of a security may be garnered from this picture because of the delay in real-world impacts from the rate rises to date. Some analysts suggest consumers have only experienced 75 basis points of the 275 basis points of rises that have occurred since the RBA began raising rates in May 2022.

Additionally, the resumption of a 46.0 cents per litre fuel excise on 29 September 2022 acts like an additional tax on consumers, and don’t forget the jump in gas and electricity bills set to be imposed on householders this quarter.

Understandably, Gary and Dominic are underweighting the retail sector. That doesn’t mean a zero weight, but it does mean the small-cap market’s relatively heavier weighting to retail stocks.

As I mentioned, retailers will report a variety of experiences through the next few quarters depending on their customers’ sensitivity to rates, fuel and utilities. That explains why Gary and Dominic do retain selective exposure to the sector. Have you examined your holdings and asked similar questions?

MORE BY RogerINVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chairman of Montgomery Investment Management. Roger has over three decades of experience in funds management and related activities, including equities analysis, equity and derivatives strategy, trading and stockbroking. Prior to establishing Montgomery, Roger held positions at Ord Minnett Jardine Fleming, BT (Australia) Limited and Merrill Lynch.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.