What to make of reporting season

What to make of reporting season

As detailed in one of our blogs in late July, the confession season had been relatively sparse this year. This set the market up for greater levels of earnings surprise than in previous years, and this is exactly what the reporting season delivered.

While the overall market as measured by the S&P/ASX 300 was only marginally down over the month of August, there were some dramatic movements in the share prices of individual companies. The volatility in individual names was not only skewed to the downside, but also included a number of significant jumps in the value of some companies.

The month opened with a 25 basis point rate cut from the RBA. This coincided with the quarterly updates of Westpac, NAB and ANZ as well as the full year results of CBA and Bendigo & Adelaide Bank.  They chose to pass on around 15 basis points of the 25 point cut to their standard variable mortgage rates. The reason for this was apparent from the bank results, which generally showed downward pressure on net interest margins due to the decision to pass on the full 25 point cut in May, increased competition for new loans in both mortgages and business, as well as a limited ability to reduce funding costs given that transaction deposit rates are already close to zero.

While any variation in the FY16 results from expectations generated a significant reaction from the market, in more cases than not it was the outlook commentary that tended to create the more significant reaction.

This was certainly the case for Blackmores, which fell 22 per cent in August as a result of comments from management that sales in the September quarter are likely to be lower than in the prior year due to Chinese customers reducing stock levels.

Aurizon similarly delivered a result that was in line with market expectations, but pointed to a weaker outlook in FY17, with the stock falling 6 per cent on the day of the result, and by 13 per cent in the month of August.

The aged care stocks were savagely dealt with by the market on the back of disappointing results and outlooks. This was compounded earlier this week by comments from Government that it believes legislation will prevent these companies from levying additional fees to boost margins unless they are related to additional services provided. This highlights the risks associated with stocks that are significantly exposed to regulatory changes that can materially impact returns. Three aged care stocks are down between 22 per cent and 44 per cent since the middle of August.

On the positive side, consumer discretionary retailers tended to surprise on the upside, with stronger sales growth continuing into July for JB Hi Fi, Harvey Norman and Nick Scali.

Stocks that provided positive surprise on both earnings results and their outlook received a more significant bump from the market. This included Downer EDI, Credit Corp, Treasury Wine Estates and Ansell.

Then there were stocks that merely had to meet expectations to see their share prices recover. These included Coca Cola Amatil, Isentia, Cleanaway and GWA.

So while an external observer might look at the movement in the broader index over the last month and conclude that not much happened, like the duck paddling on the lake, there was a lot of activity going on under the surface.

Montgomery owns shares in CBA, iSentia and Westpac.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


4 Comments

  1. Companies that reported at or above expectations with even better forward looking statements seemed to do best of all, especially ALU.

    • Hi Jim,

      ALU’s result was positive in 3 areas given it beat expectations, provided a strong outlook, and also provided longer term financial targets that surprised the market.

  2. Hi Stuart

    One of the favourite stocks of the Montgomery Team is REA Group which reported their 2016 results in early August 2016, but to date there appears to have been no commentary either good, bad or neutral from any of the team at Montgomery .

    I have quickly looked at the results and have to concede I expected a lot better. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it appears that ROE fell based on normalized EPS of about $1.62.

    The share price rose to over $65 before the 2016 results, but has recently fallen to around $57 – a fall of about 12%. I know the team don’t focus too much on market noise but am interested to know if the Montgomery valuation of $65 still stands. I think Roger may have also stated recently that the valuation is even higher at $70, but I’m not sure if that was before or after the release of the 2016 results.

    When can we expect some comments on the 2016 results and your valuation?

    • Hi Max,

      REA’s result was a bit weaker than expected as a result of greater investment in operating costs in the June quarter. The comment that listing volumes had weakened in July also made the market nervous. While this was a little disappointing, we continue to like the longer prospects for the company.

Post your comments