Thinking long and short term

Thinking long and short term

Seth Klarman is the author of an out-of print book on value investing that sometimes sells for several thousand dollars. He is also the founder and CIO at Boston-based fund manager Baupost. His latest letter has been excerpted across the internet and we thought the following section was relevant for those investors wondering how to make sense of the current boom in financial stocks, the bust in resources and whether the latest rate cut from the RBA makes any difference at all.

“Most U.S. investors today have a clear opinion about what everyone else has no choice but to do. Which is to say, with bonds yielding next to nothing, the only way investors have a chance of earning a return is to buy stocks. Everyone knows this, and is counting on it to remain the case. While economist David Rosenberg at Gluskin Sheff believes government actions could be directly or indirectly responsible for as many as 500 points in the S&P 500, or 30% of its current valuation, traders have confidence in Ben Bemanke because betting that his policies will drive equities higher has been a profitable wager. Bernanke, likewise, is undoubtedly pleased with these speculators for abetting his goal of asset price inflation, though we all know that he will not call them first when he decides to reverse direction on QE. Then, the rush for the exits will be madness, as today’s ‘clarity’ will have dissolved, leaving only great uncertainty and probably significant losses.

“Investing, when it looks the easiest, is at its hardest. When just about everyone heavily invested is doing well, it is hard for others to resist jumping in. But a market relentlessly rising in the face of challenging fundamentals – recession in Europe and Japan, slowdown in China, fiscal stalemate and high unemployment in the U.S. – is the riskiest environment of all.

“[O]nly a small number of investors maintain the fortitude and client confidence to pursue long-term investment success even at the price of short-term underperformance. Most investors feel the hefty weight of short-term performance expectations, forcing them to take up marginal or highly speculative investments that we shun. When markets are rising, such investments may perform well, which means that our unwavering patience and discipline sometimes impairs our results and makes us appear overly cautious. The payoff from a risk-averse, long-term orientation is – just that – long term. It is measurable only over the span of many years, over one or more market cycles.

“Our willingness to invest amidst failing markets is the best way we know to build positions at great prices, but this strategy, too, can cause short-term underperformance. Buying as prices are falling can look stupid until sellers are exhausted and buyers who held back cannot effectively deploy capital except at much higher prices. Our resolve in holding cash balances – sometimes very large ones – absent compelling opportunity is another potential performance drag.

“But we know that in a world in which being anti-fragile is good, what doesn’t kill you can make you stronger. Short-term underperforrnance doesn’t trouble us; indeed, because it is the price that must sometimes be paid for longer-term outperformance, it doesn’t even enter into our list of concerns. Patience and discipline can make you look foolishly out of touch until they make you look prudent and even prescient. Holding significant, low or even zero-yielding cash can seem ridiculous until you are one of the few with buying power amidst a sudden downdraft. Avoiding leverage may seem overly conservative until it becomes the only sane course. Concentrating your portfolio in the most compelling opportunities and avoiding over diversification for its own sake may sometimes lead to short-term underperformance, but eventually it pays off in outperformance.”

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chairman of Montgomery Investment Management. Roger has over three decades of experience in funds management and related activities, including equities analysis, equity and derivatives strategy, trading and stockbroking. Prior to establishing Montgomery, Roger held positions at Ord Minnett Jardine Fleming, BT (Australia) Limited and Merrill Lynch.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


6 Comments

    • We like it. US sales up a heap but get this…just $49 million. Do you think there’s room to do a little more business in the US. SOuth AMercia, $19 million in sales. Room for a few more sales on that entire continent?

  1. I found a copy of Klarman’s book in pdf and have been reading it on my iPad. His track record from 1982 is so impressive that I made an enquiry about investing in Baupost, but all I got was an email back saying that it was closed to new investors such as myself. Looks like the only option left is to manage your own capital or give it to Roger to grow. I guess coat tail investing is the other option, whereby you watch what guys like Buffett and Klarman are doing based on their SEC filings. Its hard to examine why Klarman holds certain stocks because not all of them are in Skaffold yet, but investments in bigger businesses like Oracle generally make sense from a fundamental perspective.

  2. xiao fang xu
    :

    apparently this are some excerpts from Seth Klarman latest annual letter

    The U.S. now owes $16.4 trillion to creditors, up from $10.6 trillion only four years ago.

    The government is on the hook for about another $55 trillion , in addition to public and intra-governmental debt, to meet other federal commitments and unfunded entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. The cost of such entitlement programs, well under one-third of the federal government’s total outlays in 1960, amounted to two-thirds of federal spending by 2010.

    Worse still, today’s debt-service costs are artificially low because interest rates have been pushed down by QE, mask-ing the mounting danger. Total interest expense on the federal debt is roughly unchanged from 2007 levels, even though the debt is about 80% greater. The shorter debt duration also means that the U.S. government must tap the capital markets to the tune of about $4 trillion annually, including amounts needed to fund the deficit and refinance debt maturities.

    As we enter 2013, our nation is on a dangerously flawed trajectory of unprecedented money printing, unchecked gov-ernment spending, massive federal deficits, government subsidies, artificially low interest rates, and speculative behavior.

    thanks ned.

  3. Prabha Ponniah
    :

    why has BHP shares remained so flat when share market pundits were saying it will reach $45 or so 18 months ago

    • Hi Prabha, Type “Iron Ore” into the search box on the home page of the insights blog here, and almost two years of reasons will be laid out before you.

Post your comments