• Is now the time to rebalance portfolios towards the highest quality company names that have been left behind by the rally? Read here.

Our economy is getting simpler – and that’s not good

10102019_Australian simple economy

Our economy is getting simpler – and that’s not good

KISS, an acronym for ‘keep it simple, stupid’, is a principle that works well in the field of design. But not when it comes to the national economy.  It is thus a real worry that recent research finds Australia has a ‘simple’ economy that depends on relatively few sources of export income. This leaves us exposed to changes in demand for our products, and creates risks for our national wealth.

There is no disputing that Australia has had a long period of economic growth with the last official recession being 28 years ago (although if we look at GDP per capita, rather than just total GDP, Australia has had a couple of recessions in the same time period).

As a result, Australia is the 8thrichest country in the world ranked by GDP/capita with US$54,093 in 2017 which, although it is about 30 per cent behind the richest countries in the world (Switzerland number one and Norway number two), is impressive in its own right.

Looking at data from Harvard University’s Atlas of Economic Complexity, this figure is even more impressive considering that Australia is ranked at place 93 out of 133 countries (just before Pakistan and just after Senegal) when it comes to economic complexity as can be seen in this chart:

Screen Shot 2019-10-10 at 2.43.53 pm

Economic complexity, as the name suggests, measures how diversified and sophisticated the exports that a country produces are. A low score means that the exports are simple in nature and/or concentrated to a few products.

Particularly telling is this chart which shows the complexity of the major trade flows and where we can see that basically all exports are ranked yellow, which indicates low complexity with only a few ranked green, which indicates high complexity.

Screen Shot 2019-10-10 at 2.44.28 pm

Now, there is nothing wrong per se in being very successful in selling a few products to the rest of the world as, after all, if you have a natural advantage in a particular area, you should take advantage of this and then preferably invest the proceeds of this advantage into other industries to create a diversified economy that has several legs to stand on. What is troubling to me though is that Australia’s economic complexity ranking has fallen from 57 in 1993 to 93 today which indicates that the economy is becoming more and more concentrated instead of the opposite:

Screen Shot 2019-10-10 at 2.44.52 pm

There are some very obvious dangers of being very dependent on a few sources of export income with the most obvious one being the risk that some macroeconomic factor has a significant impact on the demand for those products. If you have a diversified income base, it is less likely that all off your income sources goes down at the same time.

Another probably not so obvious impact of having an income base very concentrated in simple products is that you will have a much less flexible economy as your workers are lower skilled and will take much longer to retrain in case the demand for your exports changes, after all, it probably takes longer to retrain a coal miner to become a productive medical researcher than it takes to retrain someone with a PhD in chemistry to become a computer programmer.

For quite some time, there has been political complaints about the lack of wage growth in the economy. Is there any wonder that this is the case when the products we are producing and exporting are becoming simpler and simpler over time?


Andreas is the joint Portfolio Manager of The Montgomery Fund. Andreas joined from Navigo Partners, a M&A advisory firm in Stockholm, Sweden where he was a Director responsible for origination and execution of Scandinavian projects. Before this, he worked for three years in corporate strategy at Alinta Energy in Sydney.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE


find out more



  1. That ECI graph would correlate very well with regulation expansion on small medium and large businesses in Australia, inversely of course. And it has led to the get big or get out theme, hence the concentration in the economy, it’s just to hard to run a business here let alone start one.
    And in a globally competitive world, the end result is an own goal.
    And I doubt anything will change soon due to the political landscape we are fenced into currently.

Post your comments