Freelancing success?
Freelancer.com is the world’s largest freelancing, outsourcing and crowdsourcing marketplace. The company boasts an impressive 10 million users and 5 million projects. We wonder whether Freelancer.com has a network economy similar to other successful online marketplaces, such as Seek (ASX:SEK), REA Group (ASX:REA) and CarSales.com (ASX:CRZ)?
Freelancer.com is a website that allows users to hire contractors for a range of projects from software development, to marketing, to legal services. This medium has enjoyed success, which management is hoping to capitalise on. We note that this blog is not a commentary on the value of the company – its objective is simply to explore the dynamics of the digital freelancing industry, and how Freelancer.com’s network economy compares with other online marketplaces.
The so-called “network effect” is when a product’s value to the user increases as the number of users of the product grows. Websites such as Seek, Carsales.com, realestate.com and Facebook tend to have a positive feedback loop – the more users a site attracts, the more others will want to use it. Real value from the network effect comes when critical mass is achieved, which is when there are so many users of a service that it becomes too costly for these users to switch to a competitor.
Let’s first explore the network economy of Carsales.com. A strong network economy relies on both buyers and sellers having high switching costs. A buyer in the market for a used car would go to Carsales.com because it has the widest selection of used cars. The buyer can go to alternative sites, but the range and pricing may be inferior.
Sellers also want to post an ad on the website that has the highest addressable market, which makes Carsales.com the most attractive choice.
But what about Freelancer.com? With 10 million users, the site is certainly achieving scale and realising the benefits of a positive feedback loop. But the switching costs for buyers and sellers may not be as high as they are for Carsales.com.
Let’s consider the motives for users that are looking for contractors to complete a project, such as entering data or building a website. Employers would most likely frequent the site that provides the widest selection of contractors, as it ensures that rates are competitive, and also that a specific requirement can be fulfilled. Since Freelancer.com is the largest online marketplace, it is likely that users will switch between contractors, rather than between marketplaces.
But what about the contractors? Having access to a wide market is certainly desirable, but a crowded market can make it difficult to compete, particularly for the players that don’t have an established reviews catalogue. Just think, if two web designers have tendered for a contract, and both are charging the same hourly rate, would you most likely go with the more established player that has thousands of reviews, or the new entrant that has a handful of reviews? In this way, the contractors themselves are developing their own network effects within the market place.
So how can a new entrant compete? Well, it can stay with Freelancer.com and gradually build its customer profile. Or alternatively, it can join another freelancing site that has a relatively immature user base. Freelancer.com only clips the ticket when the user pays for a project to be completed, so there is a minimal cost to the contractor to tender on different websites. The more that these alternative sites achieve scale, the greater the threat to Freelancer.com – so it is in Freelancer.com’s best interest to handle these threats at an early stage, and to date it has typically done this via acquisitions.
Of course, acquisitions have become a necessity for Seek, REA Group and Carsales.com as they strive to maintain a high level of growth while their core markets mature. But these companies are still able to generate organic growth because their marketplaces offer unique products, and hence sticky buyers and sellers (whether it’s looking for a job, buying a house or selling a car, these products can typically only be acquired by one person).
Contractors on the other hand are relatively ubiquitous – there is a large supply of contractors that can enter data or build a website. So it will be interesting to see how reliant Freelancer.com is on acquisitions to grow earnings when it becomes a public company.
This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.
INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY
craig.cory.54
:
As a professional graphic designer I have used Freelancer.com and found it good. Essentially most of their jobs are done for economic benefits to the buyer who can put up some job specs and get a range of folks respond from all over the world and then supply it electronically so distance is not an issue. Price is a key driver but not the be all and end all as quality counts but you get to see bidders portfolio of prior work to see if they are on your wave link for quality and price before committing to each other. It’s a real win:win for both sides generally, as I can get a much cheaper job if it’s done in, say, India, by some girl in a village who earns comparitively a great local pay rate, and it’s work she wouldn’t have gotten from me with out this conduit. Risk for this co-ordinating service is the per job values are small, it’s a dating service so if another opens I can just as easily go there instead of here, and once I’ve made the contact and the relationship proves itself I can just deal direct (tho of course you are asked not to) with the supplier. Online technology via these mediums has made the world a much smaller place. Cheers, C.
michael white
:
To Roger,
As an investor in the fund will you participating in freelancer. I hope you do but leave it up to the experts
Roger Montgomery
:
Unlikely. Participating in those we think have better long term prospects. Keep in mind, when an informed seller meets an uninformed buyer you should stay on the side of the vendor.