• Check out my latest article for the australian about Why Investors are taking a fresh look at private credit and how it’s easy to see the appeal! READ NOW

Don’t let Brexit rush you to the exit

Don’t let Brexit rush you to the exit

As I write this column, the UK has voted to leave the European Union. According to relatives of members of my team living in London, Britons on the Tube are telling Eastern Europeans, “Time to pack your bags”.  The Dow is down over 5 per cent, Spain is down 12 per cent and some individual shares have fallen by more than 20 per cent.

(At the time of publication, many markets have recovered some the initial losses, which thus far serves to reinforce the comments made in this article).

Jumping at shadows is the stock market’s specialty and for an industry that is paid a percentage of activity, it relishes such events. But the Greek philosophers had it right when they said: “This too will pass.”

And pass it does

In the 66 years since 1950, there have been 57 market moves downward of 20 per cent or more in either of the US S&P 500, the UK’s FTSE, Germany’s DAX, and Japan’s Nikkei. Think about that statistic – it means a ‘crash’ in a major market every 1.15 years. I would describe that as frequent and regular. As markets become more interconnected and investors more aware, anything form slowing Chinese growth to a rising oil price can trigger panic.

When asked about whether he was worried about a big drop in the market, Warren Buffet’s colleague Charlie Munger replied:

“In fact you can argue that if you’re not willing to react with equanimity to a market price decline of 50 per cent two or three times a century you’re not fit to be a common shareholder and you deserve the mediocre result you’re going to get compared to the people who do have the temperament, who can be more philosophical about these market fluctuations.”

Munger’s comments beg the question, why would an investor be willing to invest in any market that could halve? The answer is that the stock market is the greatest concentration of financially irrational people in any one place.

Here’s an allegory used by Buffett that I like: think about a farmer in Orange, Dubbo or Parkes who has inherited a farm from a generous ancestor, and on which there is no debt. The farmer is under no pressure to sell the farm. Clearly there will be a few bad years, but there will also be a few good years. Buffett suggests you think of the stock market and its distracting and noisy volatility as the emotionally immature farm neighbour who:

“[yells] out a price every day to me at which he would either buy my farm or sell me his — and those prices varied widely over short periods of time depending on his mental state … If his daily shout-out was ridiculously low, and I had some spare cash, I would buy his farm. If the number he yelled was absurdly high, I could either sell to him or just go on farming.”

Despite their apparent significance, events like Brexit represent little more than the noisy neighbour panicking that his farm might fall further in price. The constant stream of discussion, prediction and introspection about interest rates, unemployment, inflation and the economy is nothing more than a distraction from the main game of investing.

Try to avoid the distractions

Now, it is true that prices may indeed fall but should we care? Is the value of a portfolio of pieces of extraordinary businesses determined by daily gyrating prices? We know that a company increases in value by adding retained earnings to its equity capital and maintaining its return on the now larger equity.

If I can find a business that is able to grow its equity tenfold while maintaining its return on the growing equity, I know that I will be able to sell it for far more in the future than I paid for it today. I don’t need to worry about China, the US Federal Reserve or Brexit.

Stock market investors forget the valuation mechanics of compounding returns and allow the emotional behaviour of their fellow investors to infect their decision-making, causing them to respond emotionally too. If you didn’t rush to sell your home, your hobby farm, your holiday house or your caravan during the tech wreck or the GFC, then there is no reason you should behave differently when it comes to your share portfolio. The only difference is that one is priced daily and the other assets are not.

Price is what you pay, value is what you receive. If that is true, then the value of the portfolio changes much more slowly than prices. Don’t let the daily liquidity of shares combined with the noise of Brexit and other macro events dissuade you from taking advantage of bargains or influence you to sell extraordinary companies when their shares are temporarily depressed.


Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chairman of Montgomery Investment Management. Roger has over three decades of experience in funds management and related activities, including equities analysis, equity and derivatives strategy, trading and stockbroking. Prior to establishing Montgomery, Roger held positions at Ord Minnett Jardine Fleming, BT (Australia) Limited and Merrill Lynch.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE


find out more


#Brexit, #buffett


  1. John Ackerman

    I do agree with that article completely, I had already come to that conclusion but the only snag is that it took fifty years of investing to reach it.

  2. With regard to rushing to the exits, I notice that the Montgomery Fund sold its major holding in Infomedia in late June. Some months ago Roger, you spoke in glowing terms about Isentia while on Sky Business. Considering its major decline of late, do you still rate ISD one for the future?

    • Our views can and do change. It is a major reason you should be relying on the blog for your own investing. If you want to invest in the companies we invest in (and sell out when we do), invest in one of our funds after seeking and taking personal professional advice.

  3. David Mattock

    Excellent. One of the biggest problems we have in the 21st century is the desire for constant information. This has caused a myriad of businesses to compete in providing this information – much of it is irrelevant, inaccurate or worthless. The trick is filtering it out.

  4. Greg McLennan

    “the value of the portfolio changes much more slowly than prices”

    There’s a line that should be hammered into every investor’s mind.

Post your comments