• Check out my latest feature on Ausbiz discussing AI's current winners and losers WATCH HERE

Beijing’s Big Bad Banks, Part II

Beijing’s Big Bad Banks, Part II

On Wednesday, we compared the performance of China’s Shanghai Composite Index with the US S&P 500 over the seven years to December 2013 (see here). China’s investment-driven, debt-fuelled strategy has seen poor performance from several listed companies, many of which are controlled by the state. And the threat of rising bad debts, particularly in the so-called shadow-banking sector, is yet to play out.

As discussed yesterday, China’s four major listed banks – Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank and ICBC – have a combined market capitalisation of US$637 billion, forecast a 5 per cent growth in earnings per share and an 18 per cent return on equity for FY14. They sell at a forecast 0.9 times book value; have 5 times the prospective price-earnings ratio and a 6.2 per cent dividend yield.

For context, I thought it would be useful to compare these fundamentals with those of Australia’s four major banks. ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, National Australia Bank and Westpac have a combined market capitalisation of US$352 billion, forecast a 6 per cent growth in earnings per share and a 16 per cent return on equity for FY14. Selling at a forecast 2.8 times book value and 14 times the prospective price-earnings ratio.

Table 1: China’s four major listed banks V Australia’s four major listed banks

Screen Shot 2014-01-14 at 4.16.10 PM

The Chinese banks are selling on an average dividend yield of 6.2 per cent, while the average dividend yield for the four major Australian banks is 5.4 per cent.

Interestingly, the major Australian banks are selling at an approximate 3:1 ratio in terms of the forecast FY14 price by book value, and the prospective FY14 price-earnings multiple. This is relative to the Chinese banks – despite the fact that projected earnings per share growth and forecast return on equity is similar.

 

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Chief Executive Officer of Montgomery Investment Management, David Buckland has over 30 years of industry experience. David is a deeply knowledgeable and highly experienced financial services executive. Prior to joining Montgomery in 2012, David was CEO and Executive Director of Hunter Hall for 11 years, as well as a Director at JP Morgan in Sydney and London for eight years.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


2 Comments

  1. Hi David, that’s very interesting. Thank you.
    Are you saying that Chinese banks are a buy?
    Kind regards,
    Kelvin

    • Hi Kelvin,
      assuming China’s major banks have the same or better return on equity, EPS growth and dividend yield, then they appear cheap given Australia’s major banks are selling on a 3 times ratio in terms of price/NTA and PE.

      David

Post your comments