• This Christmas, give your loved ones financial intelligence. Buy two copies of Value.able for the price of one this Christmas. Discount code: XMAS24 BUY NOW

A Scenario to Consider

A Scenario to Consider

This chart from the latest RBA Chart Pack shows (on the left hand side) the level of debt held by Australian households as a percentage of disposable income. As you can see, debt levels have been on something of a bender for the last few decades. Associated with this, we have seen excellent growth in mortgage books for the big four banks, and a generally chipper residential property market.

Screen Shot 2015-11-17 at 5.18.37 pmAustralia’s level of household debt is now very high by world standards, and at some point this becomes a problem. Increasing debt is a tonic for economic activity, but there is a limit to how much debt a dollar of disposable income can be asked to service. Our tonic bottle may not have much left in it.

This hasn’t been too pressing an issue for Australian households so far, because the RBA has had their back. Since 2011, policy interest rates have been progressively dropped to a record low 2 per cent, and that has meant that interest paid has actually declined in that time, despite the increasing debt.

Of course, the thing that would cause real household discomfort would be an increase in interest rates – something many commentators consider is unlikely in the foreseeable future.

Their view may be well-founded, but with banks starting to increase mortgage rates in response to regulatory changes, the Australian dollar declining and the RBA observing that the prospects for an improvement in economic activity have firmed, it is by no means guaranteed. Indeed, when it comes to economic forecasts, few things are ever guaranteed.

Bearing that in mind, and as an exercise in prudent financial management, it may be worth giving some thought to a “rising interest rate” scenario, and its implications for your personal finances, especially if your portfolio is built around yield assets that owe much of their current market value to low rates.

Tim Kelley is Montgomery’s Head of Research and the Portfolio Manager of The Montgomery Fund. To invest with Montgomery domestically and globally, find out more.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Tim joined Montgomery in July 2012 and is a senior member of the investment team. Prior to this, Tim was an Executive Director in the corporate advisory division of Gresham Partners, where he worked for 17 years. Tim focuses on quant investing and market-neutral strategies.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


6 Comments

  1. I think the statistics you point out will definitely be of issue, I guess the only question is when. I believe there is still another 2-3 years before we see household debt become a real issue.
    A handy calculation I have used over the last 2-3 years to make an investment decision on property is to calculate cash flow from these investments using a interest rate that is 2% higher than the current rate I am paying, If this is sustainable then pull the trigger, I know I have at least a 12 month buffer once the RBA starts hiking before I have even hit my initial margin of safety, by such time my equity within that investment would of further increased and I do not have to rush to an irrational decision should I consider the need to sell.

  2. Sure, it is worth considering a rising interest rate scenario. However the RBA will only increase rates if we have high inflation. And the US Fed is only going to increase their rates significantly if they are comfortable with the USD being a lot stronger. Neither of these things are very likely.
    And if bank funding costs increase for some other reason (i.e. not due to central bank decision) the RBA is likely to reduce the OCR to counter this.

  3. Good points Tim,

    A reasonable part of my portfolio is invested for yield, enough to cover all expenses. The rest is invested for potential capital gains or held in cash. I am not to worried about my high yielding stocks being smashed by an increase in rates. I have a bullish hypothesis, that if the economy is going well enough for the RBA to increase rates to more historical levels then (at least some) of my yield plays will be able to increase their EPS as well.

Post your comments