• Tim Kelley gives a quick review of reporting season: watch here

Revisiting bond yields and returns

1122016_image1

Revisiting bond yields and returns

Upon being asked “How did you go bankrupt?”, Ernest Hemingway’s character Mike Campbell replied “Gradually, and then suddenly”. His answer aptly summarises what has happened in the global bond markets, and particularly the US Treasurys market, since the election of Donald Trump.

To put things in perspective, it took the US 10Y Treasury yield almost three years to fall from 3 per cent to 1.36 per cent, and just four months to jump up 100 bps.

Over the past several years, many market participants held on to the belief that developed markets’ government bonds are a safe asset class regardless of price. The search for income pushed global bond yields to historical lows and pushed investors further out the yield curve.

The flawed worldview that underpinned this belief was that not only would rates be stuck lower for longer, but also any rise in inflation expectations (and hence bond yields) would be so gradual that any given bond investor could “get out before everyone else rushed for the exits”.

We have consistently warned that when sentiment turns, asset prices can move quickly. This is true for all financial assets, and government bonds are no exception. Since Trump’s “surprise” election win, many investors have unfortunately discovered that instead of picking up pennies in front of a steam roller, they had been picking up pennies in a dark train tunnel.

Given these developments, I thought it would be a good time to revisit an article I penned back in July, in which I quantified the spectrum of hypothetical losses for government bonds should yields rise (either gradually or suddenly). Fast forward four months, and bond yields have risen dramatically. The table below shows the yields and prices of various government bonds with 2 and 30 year maturities, as at 25 July and 29 November.

1

As one can see, short duration bonds that were yielding not much above (or indeed less than) zero did not experience a material change in price. However, had a yield investor bought a US 30Y Treasury for its relatively attractive yield back in July, he or she would have lost 13 per cent in the four months to November, or a 34 per cent annualised loss, for what is supposed to be a “safe” asset. To add insult to injury, the investor does not even enjoy the higher 2.98 per cent yield!

Daniel Wu is a Research Analyst at Montgomery Global Investment Management. Prior to joining Montgomery in June 2016, Daniel was an analyst in the investment banking divisions of UBS and Goldman Sachs, where he covered the Infrastructure, Utilities, Technology and Media sectors.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564) and may contain general financial advice that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking advice from a financial advisor if necessary.

Post your comments