If you can’t take the heat…

If you can’t take the heat…

A number of retailers have recently warned the market that warm weather and weaker consumer confidence after the Federal Budget are impacting trading. But how many of these retailers may be trying to use these temporary issues as an excuse for structural pressures?

As a consumer, it is easy to relate to the recent commentary provided by retailers.  It certainly feels like this autumn and winter have been unseasonably warm, while the negative commentary surrounding the budget was extensive.

But retailing can be a cyclical industry.  The weather is always changing and the Government prepares a budget each year.

In order to thrive a retailer must offer something unique and exhibit sustainable strategic advantages, whatever the weather. For high quality retailers, one warm winter may have an adverse effect on sales, but should not have a meaningful impact on the long-term prospects of the business.

The more individual retailers moan about the warmer weather, the more we question the strategic position of the underlying business.

By way of example, Pacific Brands (ASX: PBG) and Noni B (ASX: NBL) are two retailers that have recently provided market updates, and we wonder aloud about their structural challenges.

Pacific Brands – “A combination of challenging markets, declines in consumer sentiment and a warm autumn, which have been highlighted by other apparel and footwear retailers, have led to lower than expected sales growth and increased margin pressure.”

Noni B – “April and May sales were impacted by the unseasonably warm weather leading in to the winter season and reduced spending by Noni B’s core customers following the federal budget.”

It is interesting to note the management of both companies have regularly referenced cyclical factors in trying to justify mediocre performance.

And one cannot help but chuckle that, at precisely the same that Australian retailers are pointing to unseasonably warm weather as the culprit for weaker performance, other retailers in the US are pointing to unseasonably cold weather.

Only last month Walmart observed; “Like other retailers in the United States, the unseasonably cold and disruptive weather negatively impacted U.S. sales and drove operating expenses higher than expected”.

You can’t say this is a northern and southern hemisphere issue either because the nation of Italy recently reported that March industrial production declined by 0.5 per cent because, “summer came early this year.”

And the retailer Bebe noted; “Our preliminary third-quarter results were heavily impacted by the winter storms, unseasonably cold weather, and the greater than expected impact of the Easter shift”…

We’re not quite sure how much Easter shifts

In successive December half-year results, the management of Pacific Brands has said:

2013: “Reported sales were down 6.6 per cent … primarily due to low consumer sentiment and business confidence and reduced sales from lower margin portfolio brands”.

2012: “The earnings decline was driven by reduced sales in challenging retail conditions with reported sales down 19.6%…”

2011: “Underlying sales declined by 2.3 per cent in line with prior guidance as retail conditions remained challenging.”

Meanwhile, December half-year results commentary from the management of Noni B were:

2013: “The women’s fashion market remains challenging, and we continue to manage the business as efficiently as possible, without compromising the service and quality that will provide long term growth.”

2012: Having achieved an after-tax profit of $2.4 million for the first half of FY2012, the company noted that “Consumer confidence remains challenging and we expect these conditions to continue into 2012”.

2011: “As already announced, low consumer confidence since the federal election has had a major impact on demand, and the cool, wet weather during early summer delayed purchases of our summer ranges.”

If there is one constant in the world it must surely be…weather.  Hot or cold, warm or cool, the best businesses don’t blame the weather for their woes.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


4 Comments

  1. Andrew Longden
    :

    One of Montgomery’s favourites Kathmandu is the latest to give a guidance downgrade based on the weather.

    Does this change the view on Kathmandu or does it (potentially) represent a buying opportunity as these are ‘short term’ issues?

  2. Colin Petersen
    :

    Good article Ben, the overall point is valid and well made.
    One small negative that stood out for me was the aside about Easter – Easter *does* shift every year and significantly for same quarter comparisons it shifted from Q1 in 2013 to Q2 in 2014.

  3. Andrew Legget
    :

    Great post Ben, very entertaining.

    I can understand the impact on fashion businesses, who need to invest in design and manufacturing well in advance of the time they are selling their goods, that a warmer winter or colder summer might have. This is a natural risk of this type of business.

    But if the company continually trots out the same issues year on year then weather, consumer confidence, federal budgets or any other reason is more of an excuse rather than legitimate cause.

    Weather can have an impact but this is not a sustained one, if the same issues occur every year then perhaps the real reason may fall closer to the realm of the management decision making and strategic direction.

Post your comments