Are SaaS businesses the new safeties? Why Polen think they could be recession-resistant investments

Are SaaS businesses the new safeties? Why Polen think they could be recession-resistant investments

In a challenging COVID-19 environment, the performance of Polen’s Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) holdings has led the firm to question whether these companies may offer the benefits of typical recession-resistant businesses but with potentially more sustainable growth.

Here’s why:

  • The traditional software business model has significantly evolved toward a SaaS model, which, for some companies, has resulted in stronger business economics and resiliency.
  • A transition to the SaaS model can potentially unlock significant value for a business by addressing the shortcomings of the traditional software model, reducing costs, establishing a recurring revenue stream, and providing more pricing power.
  • Pursuing a SaaS model is a complex process and demands significant upfront investment, but if successful, can result in higher margins and more consistent revenues.
  • In an accelerated digital-first environment, we believe software companies have become even more mission critical to their customers both professionally and personally.

Download the whitepaper here.

In coming weeks, Montgomery will be offering investors access to a concentrated portfolio of outstanding global businesses through the Polen Capital Global Growth Fund. You can read more about the fund here: Polen Global Growth

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Established in 1979, Polen Capital is a high conviction growth investment manager with offices in the US and UK. Polen has been dedicated to serving investors by providing concentrated portfolios of the highest-quality companies for more than three decades. The firm’s established team manages US$71 billion in total assets and their longest-running flagship investment strategy has delivered on average double digit annual returns for more than 30 years.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


2 Comments

  1. In general SAAS is a far better business model than the traditional model of selling perpetual software licences.

    However, my experience is that companies can (and do) turn off SAAS products. I like to ask the following questions when deciding what to do when renewing SAAS licences:

    1) is the software business critical? Nobody likes touching anything truly business critical if they can help it.
    2) are there legal/regulatory risks if I turn off this software?
    3) how many end users are there? If there’s a lot of end users and the system works well nobody really wants to spend the money retraining people and deal with the noise of change.
    4) how many integrations are there? It’s exponentially harder changing software where more things are required to integrate.
    5) How expensive is this software? More money = more effort to get approvals with a few exceptions (e.g. microsoft, salesforce).
    6) how much data/history would you need to import if you change systems. This can be a huge pain.
    And every 5 years orwithout having to suffer the pain of change.
    7) how much effort does IT need to spend to implement the change.
    8) Are there realistic competitors? If so, you can play these companies off against each other to keep them honest. And run tenders every 5 years or so to drive down prices.
    9) Does the software provider add value to customers, or are they determined to extract as much money as possible.
    10) is our current software the “standard”. Companies will often move to the standard but will rarely leave

Post your comments