• This Christmas, give your loved ones financial intelligence. Buy two copies of Value.able for the price of one this Christmas. Discount code: XMAS24 BUY NOW

The Alpha Fund One Month In

The Alpha Fund One Month In

The new Montgomery Alpha Fund has just completed its first month of live trading, returning a pleasing 3.24 per cent for August after all fees. Given our target for the Fund is to return 6-8 per cent above the cash rate annually, this is well ahead of what we might consider “normal”.  There are a couple of observations around risk and return worth making here.

Let’s start with risk.  To recap, the Alpha Fund is designed to have lower risk than the overall equity market.  We aim to do this by eliminating all or most of the “market” risk through a market neutral construction, and we also use numerical techniques that allow us to nominate the level of risk we are willing to bear, and select the optimal mix of positions such that we get the best possible return for that nominated risk.

This should allow us to deliver a pleasing balance of risk and return, but there is still a material amount of risk involved, particularly as it relates to stock selection.  For every $1 invested, the Alpha Fund effectively puts $2 to work in the market in both long and short portfolios, and so if our stock selections are out of kilter with the market, the impact is potentially large.  On the flip side, if our selections are in kilter, then the results can be quite strong.

This becomes important during reporting season when things start moving around rapidly.  Even if the overall market doesn’t move by much during August, the winners can rise quite sharply, and the losers can fall even more sharply.  In this case, the Alpha Fund found itself on the wrong side of the ledger in some cases, but it got more right than it got wrong, and this resulted in an overall result that was well ahead of the expected norm.

So there are three things we can say about the performance of the Alpha Fund during August;

  • It was significantly higher what we estimate to be the “normal” long run average;
  • However, it was well within the range of outcomes that we might expect in any month given the risk involved. Some outcomes will be good, others not so much; and
  • It doesn’t tell us anything about what to expect next month, or the month after.

To summarise, as is the case with every fund we manage, it’s important to keep in mind the long term, and not focus too much on last month.

The Montgomery Alpha Plus Fund is priced monthly and the next subscription date is 1 October 2016. To invest, please complete the Application Form by 4pm Tuesday 27 September 2016.

INVEST WITH MONTGOMERY

Tim joined Montgomery in July 2012 and is a senior member of the investment team. Prior to this, Tim was an Executive Director in the corporate advisory division of Gresham Partners, where he worked for 17 years. Tim focuses on quant investing and market-neutral strategies.

This post was contributed by a representative of Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited (AFSL No. 354564). The principal purpose of this post is to provide factual information and not provide financial product advice. Additionally, the information provided is not intended to provide any recommendation or opinion about any financial product. Any commentary and statements of opinion however may contain general advice only that is prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs. Because of this, before acting on any of the information provided, you should always consider its appropriateness in light of your personal objectives, financial circumstances and needs and should consider seeking independent advice from a financial advisor if necessary before making any decisions. This post specifically excludes personal advice.

Why every investor should read Roger’s book VALUE.ABLE

NOW FOR JUST $49.95

find out more

SUBSCRIBERS RECEIVE 20% OFF WHEN THEY SIGN UP


3 Comments

  1. Hi Tim

    Thank you for the update, we applied to subscribe in the fund at the first available opportunity which was provided being before the end of August 2016. I have since been advised by Fundhost of the subscription at the market value you have published at the end of August. Why was the fund not opened for allotment at the inception value of $1.00

    Regards

    • Hi Karan. For the first month we ran it without any external money to make sure all the systems worked as expected. Had we known in advance that the first month would be a good one, we would have moved heaven and earth to open it to investors earlier, but of course, we didn’t know that.

Post your comments